Articles

Digital Accessibility Article

<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://cmscritic.com/critics/antonia-fedder">Antonia Fedder </a>is a digital designer, consultant, and speaker working at the intersection of accessibility, inclusion, and sustainability. She is also a CMS Critic contributor. <hr /> AI is either the greatest opportunity for the future of digital accessibility or a fast track to cementing existing exclusions. It all depends on who you ask. I honestly think both are happening at the same time, and the decisions that are being made right now will determine where we end up. The disability market remains both chronically underserved and one of the most severely underestimated in the world, and that’s before you consider the much bigger community of people who use the digital world differently: neurodivergent users, senior citizens, people with temporary impairments, anyone who’s ever encountered a digital interface that wasn’t built for them. Getting AI and accessibility right is a market question, a rights question, and a design question. This is not a niche problem. <h3 id="two-kinds-of-ai,-two-kinds-of-possibility-">Two kinds of AI, two kinds of possibility </h3>Before we go further, we need to be clear about what we’re actually talking about. "AI" covers a lot of ground. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.thehackettgroup.com/glossary/discriminative-ai/">Discriminative AI </a>works through recognition and classification. That’s the technology behind speech recognition systems like <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.voiceitt.com/">Voiceitt</a>, which learns the unique speech patterns of people with cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s, or Down syndrome, so that they can be understood by voice interfaces made only for standard speech. It supports <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/garage/wall-of-fame/seeing-ai/">Microsoft’s Seeing AI</a>, which has enabled blind and low-vision users to manage millions of independent tasks using just a smartphone camera. Generative AI creates. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.bemyeyes.com/bme-ai/">Be My AI,</a> built into the Be My Eyes app, goes beyond describing images. It enables actual conversations around them. You can ask follow-up questions and explore what you are seeing. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/personal-voice">Apple’s Personal Voice</a> allows people living with ALS or other speech-affecting conditions to create a synthetic version of their own voice in 15 minutes on a device they already own. Voice banking was available before this function, but it was expensive, time-consuming, and required specialist equipment. AI moved it to the iPhone. To me, one of the most vivid descriptions of what this access actually means came from <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://tink.uk/">Léonie Watson</a>, a blind developer and accessibility specialist, in her talk at <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://2024.ffconf.org/">FFConf 2024. </a>She described how generative AI has allowed blind users to go back through photo albums and actually experience what is in those photos: the expressions, the context, the memories. Access to personal history that had been visually inaccessible. One of the most extraordinary things this technology has opened up is that kind of agency and independence, being able to access your own life, on your own terms. <h3 id="when-the-picture-gets-complicated-">When the picture gets complicated </h3>The same tools make mistakes, and they make them confidently. AI image descriptions are hallucinating. They describe what is not there, or they miss what is. That’s a lot to be asking a blind user to decide in real-time based on what the AI is telling them about their surroundings. The gap between "this is a bit annoying" and "this is a safety issue" is precisely the gap that an intersectional lens helps us see. The term <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality">intersectionality</a> was coined by legal scholar <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimberl%C3%A9_Crenshaw">Kimberlé Crenshaw.</a> The key insight is what many people with multiple marginalised identities already know from experience: structural discrimination does not happen in neat, separate categories. Ableism, racism, sexism, class, and language access all intersect and build on each other, and the effects combine in certain ways based on who you are and what systems you are navigating. I use this lens whenever a tool is described as “neutral” or “universal,” because in reality, those words usually mean "designed for the default user" (who doesn't exist). Bias in AI systems is well-documented, and has real-world consequences. Facial recognition has long had much higher error rates for women with darker skin than for men with lighter skin. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.media.mit.edu/people/joyab/overview/">Joy Buolamwini's research at MIT Media Lab </a>made this impossible to ignore, though many have tried. Imagine a blind male user relying on facial recognition to tell him who’s standing in front of him, and getting an error. Then ask what it means to a Black blind woman with the same tool. The tool fails on both, but not to the same degree. That’s the intersectional question: who carries what risk when this goes wrong?  Who built a dataset, who it centres, who it was tested on – these are things that are important to critically question, both for accessibility and equity. If disabled people were not in the room when these systems were built, then you see the gaps in the product. The <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray-Ban_Meta">Meta Ray-Ban glasses</a> are a telling illustration of how the same technology can exist in completely different realities at once. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://afb.org/aw">The American Foundation for the Blind's AccessWorld publication</a> described them as an accessibility tool only by coincidence, designed for social media users with assistive features that exist because of the hardware and AI integration, not because disability access was ever part of the brief.  But for many blind and low-vision users, they’ve become a true independence tool: hands-free environmental description, text reading, and navigation support in a form factor that doesn’t look like medical equipment. Simultaneously, these same glasses are used to film women in public without their consent, which is harmful and violating. Technology doesn’t pick its context, and its unintended consequences tend to fall on the people who already carry the most risk. <h3 id="ai-as-barrier-shifter-">AI as barrier-shifter </h3>AI moves barriers. It doesn’t remove them. The benefits of AI accessibility tools tend to be concentrated on disabilities that are well-represented in training data, languages with large datasets, voices and bodies that systems were designed around, and hardware that people can afford. Coverage that treats these as tools that solve the whole problem ignores the structural question of who still can’t get access – and why. <h3 id="the-gap-in-governance-">The gap in governance </h3>Accessibility expertise is still called in late, consulted briefly, then dropped – a structural problem that is, once again, accelerated by AI. Automated checkers can tell you about missing alt text (alternative text) and low color contrast, but they can’t tell you if a real person using real assistive technology will actually be able to use what you’ve built. A direct word on AI-powered overlay tools: Don’t use them. In the accessibility community, they are widely seen as bad practice because they clash with assistive technology. I recently did an audit of a website for an organization that is very active in advocating for inclusion and runs a blind sports team. They thought the overlay had them covered. It missed big chunks of alt text. It hadn’t tagged the paragraph elements, so a screen reader skips right over the paragraph content. The organisation’s own blind athletes cannot read the articles written about them. Good accessibility practice is based on the principle of “Nothing About Us Without Us.” Disabled people should be included as designers, researchers, consultants, and decision-makers in all stages of design, development, and testing – and they should be involved from the start. AI can’t replace that involvement. If used well, it could free accessibility professionals to do the work that really matters and make accessibility a default built into the process from the beginning. Unfortunately, we're not there yet. <h3 id="this-is-also-a-‘market-power’-question-">This is also a ‘market power’ question </h3>The industry still views accessibility as a cost center, a compliance checkbox, or an edge case. AI can fundamentally change that equation, but only if the tools are built to be accessible, tested with real people, and governed with accountability. And the case goes far beyond the disability market. Captions were invented as a deaf accessibility feature, and became de facto for anyone watching video in a public space. Voice control, born of the need for motor accessibility, is now used by millions who just find it convenient. Neuroinclusive content is more usable, more memorable across the board, and performs better in AI-driven search contexts, with a clearer hierarchy and less cognitive load. Accessible design leads to better products, for everyone, every time. Disabled people have always been among the first to embrace and push technological innovation. Many interfaces we now take for granted originated in assistive technology. Getting AI, access, and innovation right is an opportunity to do that again, at a scale and speed that has not been available before. The returns aren't just about equity. They’re about what kind of digital world we build, how well it works, and for how many users. Both the optimistic and the dystopian scenarios are perfectly plausible. Which one we get depends on decisions being made right now, mostly by people without disabilities, in organizations that haven’t yet asked the right questions.  <hr /><h3 id="upcoming-events">Upcoming Events</h3>  <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.boye-co.com/conferences/cmsconnect26"><img style="width:41.96%" src="https://cmscritic.com/ms-content/uploads/2026/05/cms-connect-logo-26.jpg" /></a><h4 id="cms-connect-26"><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.boye-co.com/conferences/cmsconnect26">CMS Connect 26</a></h4>August 5-6, 2026 – Montreal, CanadaThe best conferences create space for honest, experience-based conversations. Not sales pitches. Not hype. Just thoughtful exchanges between people who spend their days designing, building, running, and evolving digital experiences. CMS Connect brings together people who share real stories from their work and platforms and who are interested in learning from each other on how to make things better. Over two days in Montreal, you can expect practitioner-led talks grounded in experience, conversations about trade-offs, constraints, and decisions, and time to compare notes with peers facing similar challenges. Space is limited for this exclusive event, <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.boye-co.com/conferences/cmsconnect26">so book your seats today.</a> <img style="width:36.69%" src="https://cmscritic.com/ms-content/uploads/2026/01/open-source-cms-26.jpg" /><h4 id="open-source-cms-26"><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.boye-co.com/conferences/opensourcecms26">Open Source CMS 26</a></h4>October 20–21, 2026 – Utrecht, NetherlandsJoin us for the first annual edition of our prestigious international conference dedicated to making open source CMS better. This event is already being called the “missing gathering place” for the open source CMS community – an international conference with confirmed participants from Europe and North America. Be part of a friendly mix of digital leaders from notable open source CMS projects, agencies, even a few industry analysts who get together to learn, network, and talk about what really matters when it comes to creating better open source CMS projects right now and for the foreseeable future. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.boye-co.com/conferences/opensourcecms26/tickets">Book your tickets today.</a> <img style="width:35.73%" src="https://cmscritic.com/ms-content/uploads/2026/05/image-1778200565145.png" /><h4 id="contentstack-contentcon-2026">Contentstack <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.contentstack.com/contentcon">ContentCon 2026</a></h4>September 30 - October 1, Amsterdam  /  October 27-28, 2026 – ChicagoContentstack’s annual customer conference is the premier event for executives, marketing leaders, and developers to redefine their digital experience strategy. This is your opportunity to step out of the "status quo" and into "elite" status, learning exactly how the world’s most successful brands are using the technology you already own to do the impossible. Enjoy a full day of interactive workshops, certifications, and inspirational on-stage sessions designed to help you become an expert on cutting-edge digital strategies and how to turn Contentstack's CMS and adaptive personalization tools into your greatest competitive advantage.<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.jdayusa.com/"> </a><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.contentstack.com/contentcon">Book your seats today.</a>

AI and Accessibility: Incredible Potential, Inconvenient Questions 

antonia-fedder

Accessibility Needs Heroes, and Lucy Greco Brings a Paralympian’s Heart to the Digital Field

matt-garrepy

<hr /> May 16th is <a target="_blank" href="https://accessibility.day/">Global Accessibility Awareness Day</a>. It's a moment to reflect on how far we've come in our quest to build a more accessible world and discuss the continued work ahead. On the digital side of the ledger, there's still a lot to do.In honor of the 13th annual GAAD (we love our “shortcodes” in CMS, and this is a helpful one), <a target="_blank" href="https://www.acquia.com/">Acquia</a> – a leader in open digital experience software – just released its <a target="_blank" href="https://www.acquia.com/accessibility-report-2024">2024 Survey Report: Consumer Perspectives on Digital Accessibility</a>. The analysis reveals how website users with disabilities perceive the state of digital accessibility and how their experiences impact brand reputation and loyalty. This report contains some shocking stats. For starters, 89% of participants say they encounter accessibility issues that make it challenging to interact with websites or other digital experiences offered by brands. In addition, 62% say they would consider switching to a competitor with better accessibility features. “It’s clear that digital experiences are not meeting the accessibility expectations of those who need them. This is a critical business issue that requires more attention,” said <a target="_blank" href="https://cmscritic.com/acquia-and-the-art-of-the-possible-interview-with-chief-market-officer-jennifer-griffin-smith">Jennifer Griffin Smith</a>, Chief Market Officer at Acquia. “Digital accessibility is an essential pillar of digital experience design and management that should not be overlooked or shortchanged. Creating equal, accessible opportunities for all is a value all marketers and organizations should strive for.”The online survey was conducted in April 2024 by <a target="_blank" href="https://researchscape.com/">Researchscape</a> and is composed of responses from 1,265 adults across the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia who identified as having a disability. <h3 id="neglecting-digital-accessibility-is-impacting-brands">Neglecting digital accessibility is impacting brands</h3>The Acquia survey found that not only are disability issues widespread, but so are the impacts. For example, when encountering accessibility issues on digital platforms, 45% of respondents describe the experience as either “very” or “extremely” frustrating. It's not a leap to assume that brand reputation is negatively impacted when users encounter these digital accessibility challenges. Survey participants also report a myriad of feelings in response to accessibility issues. 71% express frustration, while 58% say they feel “disappointed” and 24% register as “angry.” Nearly 1 in 5 say they feel excluded.When asked what steps they are most likely to take when experiencing these issues, 34% said they would complain directly to the brand, and 31% of respondents said they would talk about the accessibility issue with their family and friends. However, 20% leverage social media to share their experiences, creating a ripple effect of negative brand perception that extends far beyond the disabled individuals who experience these problems first-hand.In terms of a direct impact on brands and their bottom lines, 51% of respondents stated they would most likely seek alternative options that are more accessible, and 42% said they would discontinue using the brand’s services.  <h3 id="prioritizing-digital-accessibility-can-build-confidence-and-trust-">Prioritizing digital accessibility can build confidence and trust </h3>The survey's participants codify what we already know: more work needs to be done to improve digital accessibility for all users, and brands can reap the benefits on multiple levels – if they take swift action. To that end, 93% of consumers surveyed say that it's important that the brands they engage with prioritize digital accessibility. However, consumers want progress over platitudes, and many respondents expressed skepticism about the true intentions of companies when messaging around digital accessibility. In the past year, only 27% of respondents said they believe that brands are taking accessibility seriously and making meaningful improvements. It gets worse from there: 33% believe companies are just “doing the basics” to check the regulatory compliance box. 28% believe that while companies talk about accessibility as a marketing tactic, not much action has been taken – and 12% believe that companies aren’t thinking about or doing anything to improve digital accessibility.  “Ultimately, we’re talking about a large proportion of the population who would like to access, enjoy, and get value from digital experiences," Jennifer Griffin Smith concluded. “As digital marketers, we should not be excluding anyone from engaging with or participating in our digital content. This is an enormous opportunity to grow your customer base, increase revenue and, above all else, improve customer satisfaction and brand loyalty.”To view more details from the study, visit <a target="_blank" href="https://www.acquia.com/accessibility-report-2024">https://www.acquia.com/accessibility-report-2024</a> <hr /><h3 id="upcoming-conferences">Upcoming conferences</h3> <img style="width:29.67%" src="https://cmscritic.com/ms-content/uploads/2024/01/cms-connect-2024-logo.png" alt="CMS Connect 24 logo" /><h4 id="cms-connect-24"><a target="_blank" href="https://www.boye-co.com/conferences/cmsconnect24">CMS Connect 24</a></h4>August 6-7, 2024 – Montreal, CanadaWe are delighted to present our first annual summer edition of our prestigious international conference dedicated to the global content management community. Join us this August in Montreal, Canada, for a vendor-neutral conference focused on CMS. Tired of impersonal and overwhelming gatherings? Picture this event as a unique blend of masterclasses, insightful talks, interactive discussions, impactful learning sessions, and authentic networking opportunities. <img style="width:29.58%" src="https://cmscritic.com/ms-content/uploads/2024/01/cms-kickoff-2025-logo.png" /><h4 id="cms-kickoff-25"><a target="_blank" href="https://www.boye-co.com/conferences/cmskickoff25/tickets">CMS Kickoff 25</a></h4>January 14-15, 2025 – Tampa Bay Area, FloridaJoin us next January in the Tampa Bay area of Florida for the third annual CMS Kickoff – the industry's premier global event. Similar to a traditional kickoff, we reflect on recent trends and share stories from the frontlines. Additionally, we will delve into the current happenings and shed light on the future. Prepare for an unparalleled in-person CMS conference experience that will equip you to move things forward. This is an exclusive event – space is limited, so secure your tickets today.

Acquia Survey Reveals Brands are Paying the Price for Digital Accessibility Deficiencies

cms-critic-staff

Explore a wide range of informative articles on Digital Accessibility, insights, and industry updates. Stay informed and ahead of the curve with our diverse collection of news and posts covering the latest trends and developments in the industry

News

AI and Accessibility: Incredible Potential, Inconvenient Questions

Accessibility Needs Heroes, and Lucy Greco Brings a Paralympian’s Heart to the Digital Field

Acquia Survey Reveals Brands are Paying the Price for Digital Accessibility Deficiencies